Name:
Location: Sacramento, California, United States

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Antiwar, anti THIS war, anti soldier

Debating the value of a military mission you pay for with your taxes, and/or life or life of your child/loved one is not the same as debating the need for soldiers, guns, and nukes, in general. Listen up retards, and try to pay attention. If you are a true pacifist, God bless you, you are a better person than I; the rest of us have to come to terms with are positions. If you are a citizen of a country, and by citizens I mean a tax paying, voting, member of society, that keeps a standing army ready to defend against all foes, you have an obligation to humanity to carefully define what is a foe. Deciding who is a foe is not the same as debating the pacifist position of having foes but fighting them without violence.

What is my point? Disagreeing with Bush's and Clinton's war on the Middle East is not the same as dissing the troops who are sent on these imperialist adventures. You could have a debate about what makes a soldier want to be a soldier, or if killing under any rationalization is acceptable, but lets be sophisticated enough to separate the issues. Can we handle that, retards.

So, when you say, “Supports the troops,” it doesn’t have to mean support the Hitler who sent them to invade Poland.

Fucking retards.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home